Thursday, December 2, 2010

"Miley's" Naked Picture Scandal

Hello friends,

So by now I'm sure many of you have heard about Miley's alleged naked picture scandal.
If not here's the scoop:
Supposedly someone stole Miley's purse from her birthday party, took her iPhone, and uploaded a bunch of her private and racy pictured on to the internet, one of which featured Miley completely naked except for a plaid flannel shirt.

DON'T buy into this story just yet folks. I think it's complete crap, and here's why:

First of all, Miley's birthday party had intense security. It was only close friends and family. She said this herself. That means in order for the claim about the iPhone being stolen to be accurate, it would mean that one of her friends/family members would have to be the culprit. This seems unlikely.

Second, yes, clearly some of of the pictures that were leaked are in fact Miley. For example. the following:

This picture is OBVIOUSLY Miley... but let's just take a second to note the fact that she's HOLDING her iPhone in this picture.... so this obviously can't be a picture that was "leaked" off her supposedly "stolen" iPhone, because it was clearly taken by somebody ELSE'S phone/camera. So that's just another hole in this story.

BUT despite all this, the most obvious problem with this story is that the supposed "naked" picture mysteriously doesn't show Miley's face, as seen below:

On first glance, I guess it could be easy to just assume that this is Miley. Sure the hair looks kinda similar, and she is holding an iPhone 4, which Miley also uses. But ANY Miley fan should be able to quickly spot the problem with this picture: where's her tatoo? Miley has a tatoo on her rib cage, just under her breast. This tatoo is clearly absent in this picture. Many people are attempting to argue that the tatoo is being covered by her shirt, or that the tatoo is in fact on her right side and so cannot be seen in the picture. But how about we take five seconds to look at the following:

The tatoo is clearly on her LEFT, not her right, and it is centered almost directly below her breast meaning it should be clearly visible in the supposed nude photo.

*** HOWEVER I have just recently come to to the realization that the alleged nude photo was taken in a mirror... This means that we may in fact be seeing her RIGHT side, not her left side. Which would explain the missing tattoo ***

Regardless, in my opinion someone made this whole story up. The fact that Miley's party had too much security for it to be plausible that her phone was stolen is a major hole in this story. In addition to this though, the fact that Miley's iPhone is visible in one of the "leaked" photos indicates that the pictures didn't come off her iPhone at all, which punches another huge hole in the story. Also, if you take the time to look at the rest of these "leaked" photos, none of them (with the exception of the "nude" photo) are taken by Miley, she is merely posing - suggesting once again that these photos did NOT come off of her allegedly stolen iPhone, but perhaps from someone else's phone/camera. This all seems very suspicious.

The nude photo, in my opinon, was probably taken by a Miley look alike. This same person then most likely got a hold of some personal photos of Miley and then posted them along side the nude photo in order to make it appear as though all the pictures came from the same source (i.e. Miley's phone).

Don't believe everything you read on the internet - more often than not it's just people with nothing better to do with their lives than trying to ruin someone else's. It's sad, but true.

Let me just finish by saying that even it DOES turn out that this nude photo is of Miley - what business is it of ours? What Miley does in her personal life is her business and no one else's. We need to respect her privacy and try worrying about controlling our own lives instead of trying to control hers.